{"id":214,"date":"2015-10-23T00:27:22","date_gmt":"2015-10-23T04:27:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/opentextbc.ca\/postconfederation2e\/chapter\/5-3-immigrants-by-the-numbers\/"},"modified":"2020-07-17T16:03:17","modified_gmt":"2020-07-17T20:03:17","slug":"5-3-immigrants-by-the-numbers","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/opentextbc.ca\/postconfederation2e\/chapter\/5-3-immigrants-by-the-numbers\/","title":{"raw":"5.3 Immigrants by the Numbers","rendered":"5.3 Immigrants by the Numbers"},"content":{"raw":"[caption id=\"attachment_211\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"400\"]\"Three<\/a> Figure 5.2 Immigrants from Arab countries faced a cool welcome in Canada. Tagged by the Immigration officers, three hopeful candidates in Quebec, 1908.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nWe have already\u00a0observed\u00a0that Canada was a net exporter of people from 1867-1896. Newcomers arrived, but they were very often just passing through. The end to free land in the American West in the 1890s was one factor in redirecting the tide of emigrants from Europe toward the north. Another, from 1896, were the new approaches taken by the Laurier administration under the leadership of Clifford Sifton (see Sections 4.4<\/a> and 5.4<\/a>).\r\n\r\nThis is not to say that the immigration that was recorded from 1867-1896 did not matter. Hundreds of thousands were added to the mix and the composition of Canadian settler society changed significantly. British immigrants were the most numerous, but people who described themselves as German in origin increased by half from 203,000 in 1871 to 310,000 in 1901. Three immigrant groups stand out in particular in 1901: Chinese numbers reached 17,312 (increasing from 4,400 in 1881 ); Russians at 19,825; and Scandinavians (Norwegians, Swedes, Icelanders, and Finns grouped together) totalled about 31,000. None of these groups had much of a presence in Canada prior to Confederation (although there were Chinese in British Columbia in significant numbers before 1871).\r\n\r\nTables 5.1 and 5.2, respectively, show the growth in population generally and the numbers of immigrants arriving yearly between 1867-1920. What may be seen immediately is: 1) the slowness of immigration\u2019s growth before the 1890s (notwithstanding a couple of spurts); 2) the fact that it was actually in retreat through most of the 1880s and into the 1890s; and 3) the great take-off of immigration as Canada moves into the 20th century. The peak on the eve of the Great War is also unmistakable, in that it is followed by a near-collapse as the conflict rages. In the years 1911, 1912, and 1913 between 300,000 and 400,000 immigrants arrived each year, most of them from Britain and continental Europe.[footnote]Roderic Beaujot, Population Change in Canada: The Challenges of Policy Adaptation <\/i>(Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1991), 105.[\/footnote]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_212\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"545\"]\"A<\/a> Table 5.1 Estimated Population of Canada 1867\u20131920 (000s)[\/caption]\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"attachment_213\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"544\"]\"A<\/a> Table 5.2. Immigrant Arrivals, 1867-1920. [Long description]<\/a>[\/caption]The complexion of the population overall changed dramatically from the mid-1860s to the interwar years. On the eve of Confederation, fewer than one-in-five Canadians came from somewhere else, principally the British Isles or the United States. Thereafter, the share of immigrants actually fell.<\/em> The share of Canadians born elsewhere continued to drop until the first decade of the new century. Then, the great waves of pre-WWI immigration reversed that 'Canadianizing' trend and once again the population was more than one-fifth foreign-born. Demographically, this meant Canada as a whole -- and the West in particular -- was now a different place. In 1871 French and English were the norms, although there was a significant German community. By 1911, a quarter of the immigrant tide was coming from continental Europe and most of that from central, eastern, and southern Europe. There was much continuity as well as change: the majority (just over half) of the foreign-born as late as 1931 came from Britain and Ireland; another 20% or more were born in the United States. Even in 1921, however, the main \u201cethnic\u201d immigrant groups constituted more than one-in-eight of the population. Regardless of point of origin, as of 1921 the immigrant population in Canada was proportionally larger than in the United States.[footnote]Donald H. Avery, Reluctant Hosts: Canada\u2019s Response to Immigrant Workers, 1896-1994<\/em> (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1995), 22.[\/footnote]\r\n\r\nWe know as well that immigrants in the pre-Great War period were overwhelmingly male. Men\u00a0are over-represented in every age category from 10\u00a0to\u00a014 years and up (after 65 years, the ratio of men to\u00a0women\u00a0nearly balanced out). This suggests that either boys were demonstrating a particular determination to emigrate from Europe and Asia or that they were preferred to daughters when it came time to move (principally because their prospective job prospects were better). In other words, families with more sons than daughters might be more inclined to emigrate than those with more daughters. As to young adults, these sex ratio imbalances had serious ramifications. In the 20 to 34 age cohorts, there were more than twice as many men as women in 1911. Women and daughters might be sent for later, but this pattern of maleness persists throughout much of the 20th century. The sex ratio among the foreign-born reaches a peak of 1.68 men to every woman in 1911 and among certain immigrant groups it could be much higher. Among the Chinese it hovered around 200:1 for decades, and among the Scandinavians in 1931 it was 268:1. These last examples are very definitely outliers, but the implications of a distorted sex ratio for marital fertility ought to be obvious.\r\n\r\nWhat is more, we know that the immigrant population was young but adult. The foreign-born on the eve of the Great War were mostly under 40 years of age and 20-somethings was\u00a0the largest cohort. Despite photogenic images of immigrant families, surprisingly few foreign-born children appear in these statistics.[footnote]Warren E. Kalbach, The Impact of Immigration on Canada\u2019s Population<\/i> (Ottawa: Dominion Bureau of Statistics, 1970), 54.[\/footnote] Having said that, the arrival of immigrants brought higher fertility rates, so much so that they slowed and, in places, reversed a significant downward trend in Canadian fertility rates. The estimated annual average number of births per 1,000 population in Canada in 1851-61 was 45; in 1901-11 it fell to 31 and slid to 29 between 1911-1921.[footnote]Warren E. Kalbach and Wayne W. McVey, The Demographic Bases of Canadian Society <\/i>(Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1971), 56-7, 134-5.[\/footnote] Without the high fertility of immigrant communities these numbers would have been more depressed.\r\n\r\nDistribution of immigrants provides a different sense of this change. The Maritime provinces and Quebec experienced little demographic change arising from immigration. Lebanese Christians were an important addition to Prince Edward Island, but there were few other\u00a0ethnic enclaves in the region by the Great War. The share of population that was foreign born in the Maritimes\u00a0was only 5.2% in 1901, rising to a little more than 6% in 1911 \u2014<\/strong> a level that held nearly steady for 30 years. Quebec was similarly mostly native-born in 1901 \u2014<\/strong> a comparable 5.4% of the population was foreign \u2014<\/strong> but from there the share increased more markedly to 7.3% in 1911 and more than 8% in the Interwar years. West of the Ottawa River, however, 15% of Ontarians were foreign-born in 1901 and that passed the 20% mark before the Great\u00a0War and continued to rise to nearly 25% in 1931. The Prairie provinces taken as a region began the century with a quarter of the population born abroad, rising to 49% in 1911. The share dropped to 21% in 1921 but that reflected the impact of immigrant fertility \u2014<\/strong> the newcomers were adding significant native-born children to the population and thus shrinking their own share of the total. Still, the renewal of immigration in the 1920s created a second surge and by 1931 nearly 37% of Prairie Canadians were born elsewhere. British Columbia behaved differently from the rest of Canada in this respect, being the least native-born population of the lot. Foreigners constituted 44% of the population in 1901, rising to 57% in 1911 and only tapering slightly to 50% in 1921. From 1901 to 1961, British Columbia\u2019s population was, proportionately, the most foreign-born of all regions. Of all the regions, only the North-West\u00a0Territories reversed the trend. Starting at 37% in 1901, the share of Northerners born abroad fell\u00a0to 20% 10\u00a0years later and then 15% in 1921, where it stayed for the next two\u00a0decades.[footnote]Warren E. Kalbach and Wayne W. McVey, The Demographic Bases of Canadian Society <\/i>(Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1971), 143.[\/footnote]\r\n\r\nStudies of immigrants in Canada tend to focus on their experiences as newcomers adjusting to new circumstances, or as outsiders to which the established population reacts, or as ethnic enclaves whose cultural resilience and change is subject to examination. As a demographic phenomenon, however, their profound impact is often too quickly forgotten. Within little more than a generation, post-Confederation immigrants had fundamentally transformed the population's main features while changing in significant ways its fertility, family size, and nuptial patterns. In each of these regards, they had a\u00a0lasting impact.\r\n
\r\n

Key Points<\/h2>\r\n