Key Takeaways

  • Language acquisition has been studied extensively, but there are many mysteries to this subject.
  • The two main sides of the language acquisition debate are the rationalists and the empiricists.
  • The rationalists claim language has (at least to some extent) some innate structures independent of experience
  • The empiricists claim that language is acquired from exposure to linguistic input from the environment
  • Chomsky introduced the idea that children do not receive enough input and samples of a language to learn linguistic rules by mere exposure (the poverty of the stimulus)
  • The concept of innate structures (either a language acquisition device or universal grammar) is supported by the development of creoles as complete languages from children’s exposure to pidgin


Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Psychology of Language Copyright © 2021 by Dinesh Ramoo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book