Chapter 7: FLO MicroCourses
FLO MicroCourse Peer Feedback Rubric
| Criterion | Sophisticated | Competent | Marginal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is descriptive | Focuses on observation | Includes observation, and also inferences | Gives broad statements that could apply to any project |
| Is specific | The feedback refers to actual elements in the project | Refers to the project, but it is unclear which elements align with the feedback | Does not refer to elements of the project in feedback, indicating that the project has not been thoroughly reviewed |
| Is respectful | Acknowledges strengths and/or potential | Offers advice without pointing out promising elements | Emphasizes inadequacies |
| Is useful | Offers rationale on critique, and perhaps suggestions | Identifies areas for improvement but could do more to elaborate on why | Does not elaborate beyond a judgment of work (e.g. I like your idea) |
| Engages | Invites further dialogue using an inquisitive tone that demonstrates genuine interest | Asks questions in an effort to prompt further discussion | Does not elaborate beyond statements about project |
| Is realistic | Considers both the scope of the project and expected skill level of the learner | Demonstrates an understanding of the work involved | Provides suggestions that would not necessarily be feasible to undertake |